I was on site for process consulting and trouble shooting of a customers mold. They had some issues with gate blush and unbalanced parts in a family mold or 1+1 mold with unlike parts. for more detail in how I come about troubleshooting a problematic mold please read the process page on this site.
By following the scientific molding principles I was able to properly locate the injection stage for the gate area of the part and therefore control the speed of flow for the ABS material and eliminate the gate blush.
Another issue they were having was improper packing of one of the parts. One part was flashing and the other had sink marks (pits or areas that look like shallow pot holes.) This particular mold had good sprue, and runner size, although the gate size was not optimal. It is more difficult to determine proper gate size with dissimilar parts as they have different weights and wall thickness. I suggested we focus on the under filled part only instead of adjusting both sides. The larger part had gates that were under specification for depth and width. The gate depth determines the seal off time and the width determines the amount of volume that can be flowed. I had the customer increase the width by 50% as the optimal depth is usually 80% of wall thickness and width is 150% of gate depth.
Upon putting the mold back in the machine the parts were now balanced and issues resolved. The packing time had been reduced by 50% or 20 seconds reducing the cycle time by 5 seconds and significantly reducing the machine power usage. It was now sitting under no load in a cooling stage instead of applying pressure during a longer than normal packing stage. I also had the customer remove some of the loops in the cooling lines as the parts were dissipating a lot of heat into the mold which was not being removed.
Tags: cavity, cycle time, family mold, gates, molding, packing, Process Consulting, trouble shooting, wall thicknessFor process consulting of an injection mold I apply the following scientific molding principles. I have included numbered highlights and bullet points for additional detail. All principles, processes, and methodologies are scalable as GeForce Technologies grows. This is an overview and does not include everything.
These methodologies are not my own but a result of training and study. The principles were created by engineers, scientists, and the community in an effort to eliminate problematic parts and molds due to process guesswork. Internal plastic part stress can’t be seen by the naked eye and can cause catastrophic failure of parts in the field. I am passionate about doing things right and to the best of my abilities with the many resources that are available. GeForce Technologies is grounded in these principles and they will continue to evolve as the industry does.
These principles will only work optimally on a mold and machine that is setup properly for the material that is being ran. A common mistake is to design every mold the same when it comes to size specifications. This includes mold specifications as follows: sprue orifice, sprue size, runner size, subrunner size, gate size and type, vent width and depth, draft, textures, and proper quantity and location of ejector pins. Machine specifications such as screw type, nozzle type and size. Plastic part design that follows material specifications for wall thickness, draft, texture, rib thickness, gate location and wall thickness at gate.
There are specific specifications for all of these sizes and types based on each material type. It is ideal to follow these guidelines to ensure optimal cycle time, and part quality.Which in turn will increase profits significantly. Especially when you consider reducing the amount of times a mold is taken in and out of the machine and sent to the machine shop for costly adjustments and delivering parts to market late, or delivering parts that will fail.